Legal Opinion

Hudgins v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 4, 2003No. Record 0078-02-1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDER, Judge.

Tarik H. Hudgins (appellant) appeals from his bench trial conviction for grand larceny from the person in violation of Code § 18.2-95(i). On appeal, he contends the trial court erroneously ruled that his trial and conviction for grand larceny from the person did not violate double jeopardy principles in light of his previous acquittal on an indictment for robbery arising out of the same theft. Because appellant’s acquittal on the robbery indictment acted as an acquittal on the lesser-included offense of petit larceny, we hold that the collateral estoppel protections of the Double…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hudgins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  2. Morris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Hudgins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  4. Hudgins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  5. Hudgins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API