Legal Opinion

Laday v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 14, 1969No. 65-C-77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

GRUBB, Senior District Judge.

On plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment together with interest, and for award of attorneys’ fees submitted on the briefs of counsel.

This action for enforcement of an award of the National Railroad Adjustment Board is before the court following interpretation of the award after second remand to the Board.

Defendant objects to enforcement of the award as most recently construed on the ground that it is arbitrary and without foundation in fact. The subject of the latest request for interpretation was the phrase “compensation * * * for each day that T. H.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powell v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Raabe v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1966
  3. Dieringer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosa M. Figueroa De Arroyo v. Sindicato De Trabajadores Packinghouse, Afl-Cio, and Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. United Transportation Union, a Voluntary Unincorporated Labor Association v. Soo Line Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API