Legal Opinion
Mundet Cork Corp. v. Grupp
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The holder of a note in due course is not bound by a payment made to a prior holder after the transfer of the note. Such a payment is made at the peril of the one making it. (Carr v. Lewis, 20 N. Y. 138; First National Bank of Bridgeport v. Blackman, 249 id. 322.)
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the amount claimed in the summons.
All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carr v. . LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
3Cited by2 opinions
- Industrial Bank of Commerce v. HayseCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948
- Unadilla National Bank v. McQueerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967