Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cohen v. Calhoun

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1933No. 30689Published

1Dissent

Ethridge, J.,

delivered a dissenting opinion.

I cannot agree with the construction placed upon section 3353, Code of 1930', by the majority opinion. The provision of the statute, “A sale of any portion of a stock of merchandise, otherwise than in the ordinary course of trade, or in the regular and usual prosecution of the seller’s business,” etc., should receive a reasonable construction. The construction placed upon it by the majority opinion is, in my judgment, too narrow; is unreasonable, and tends to make the statute an instrument of injustice rather than one of justice.

In the court below,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mahoney-Jones Co. v. Sams Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fiske Rubber Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Armfield Co. v. . SaleebySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Armfield Co. v. SaleebySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Carpenter v. KarnowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API