Legal Opinion
Clarendon County v. Curtis
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1931No. 2972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
Allen Curtis and others, partners trading as Curtis & Sanger, of . Boston and New York, were plaintiffs in the court below, and the county of Clarendon, S. C., was defendant. ■ We shall so refer to them here.
This cause was instituted to recover on four promissory notes aggregating $34,177 executed by the defendant. These notes were made payable to the Bank of. Manning, of Manning, S. C., and were by' it indorsed in blank without recourse.
Plaintiffs allege that they purchased them from the American- Bank & Trust Company of Columbia, S. C., that-that bank and the Bank of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Holmes v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
- Commercial Trust Co. of Hagerstown v. Laurens CountsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Household Finance Company, Inc. v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Peurifoy, Rec'r v. BoswellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- State Street Trust Co. v. Muskogee Electric Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Marks v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- State Street Trust Co. v. Muskogee Electric Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.