Legal Opinion

HINAMAN v. Vandergrift

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1962No. Appeal, 251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is a complaint in equity by certain property owners, the plaintiffs-appellants, against the Supervisors of Old Lycoming Township and Old Lycoming Township, defendantsrappellees, praying the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County for injunctive relief to restrain any attempt to collect assessments for the construction of pavements as provided for in an ordinance of the township adopted September 5, 1958; and to declare the • ordinance invalid, illegal and unconstitutional.

The matter was tried before Judge Charles F. Geeevy, sitting as Chancellor and he found that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia ex rel. Mack v. EddlemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Vendetti AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Angle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. City of Chester v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Philadelphia v. MeighanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Appeal of Boeing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Mount Lebanon Township v. HobbesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Upper Merion Township v. Stewart, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1967
  4. Cassidy v. Old Lycoming Township, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1974
  5. Old Lycoming Township v. FarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API