Legal Opinion
Cong v. Zhao
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 6, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01703Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 FANG CONG and LIN JIANG, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-01703-TL 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION 13 XUE ZHAO; “Conveyor Belt Sushi”; and 14 VALVE CORPORATION, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Fang Cong and Lin Jiang’s Motion for 18 Reconsideration. Dkt. No. 70. Having reviewed Defendant Valve Corporation’s response (Dkt. 19 No. 72) and the relevant record, the Court DENIES the motion. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 The Court assumes familiarity with the facts of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Kemp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Navajo Nation v. James W. Norris Gayle Norris v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Plaintiff-Intervenor. Navajo Nation v. James W. Norris Gayle Norris v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Plaintiff-Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Edward A. Ashford v. Charles Steuart, Don Erby, Ray Beaman, Steve Stedfelt, and Maynard RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.