Legal Opinion

Intermountain Ranches, Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1994No. 93-15944Published

1Opinion of the Court

45 F.3d 436

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

INTERMOUNTAIN RANCHES, LTD.; Melvin H. Gardner; Belva H.

Gardner; Lee C. Atkin; George L. Gardner,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Mike Espy,**

Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of

America, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-15944.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1994.*

D…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Fifty-Three (53) Eclectus Parrots, and George E. Allen, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Western Energy Company v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API