Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1999No. 98-SC-0732-DGPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

An essential element of first degree robbery is that the accused must be in the course of committing a theft. At trial, evidence was presented that Billy Ray Smith, Appellee herein, held a gun on the victim and threatened him while Smith’s cohort searched the victim’s pockets for cash. Was this evidence against Smith sufficient to show that Smith was in the course of committing a theft and thus sufficient to sustain a conviction of first degree robbery?

The facts are as follows. The victim, Cleon Sumner, was a 50-year old mentally disabled man who was known in Perry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BenhamKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth Transportation Cabinet Department of Highways v. TaubKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Estep v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dishman v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Morgan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Young v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fischer v. FischerKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Quisenberry v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Gray v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Potts v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API