Legal Opinion

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Monks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1982No. AB-37PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation action the employer/carrier urges two points on appeal which we agree should be reversed and remanded. As to Point I, we agree with the appellant that the deputy commissioner erroneously included the claimant’s earnings from self-employment as an independent contractor in computing the average weekly wage. See Randell, Inc. v. Chism, 404 So.2d 175, (Fla. 1st DCA, 1981); Jay Livestock Market v. Hill, 247 So.2d 291 (Fla.1971); Parrott v. City of Ft. Lauderdale, 190 So.2d 326 (Fla.1966).

Point II requires reversal because the deputy’s inaccurate and inconsistent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parrott v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Randell, Inc. v. ChismDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Jay Livestock Market v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Neisner Bros., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. ANNA MARIA FIRE CONTROL DIST. v. AngellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Iley v. LinzeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API