Legal Opinion · Dissent

Denberg v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 4, 1983No. 81-2386Published

1Dissent

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

The majority opinion follows the customary jurisdictional track for administrative review. I hesitate to take another route, but it seems to me that the good reasons for following that customary procedure laid out for the ordinary Board case are without substance in the circumstances of this particular case. There has been determined to be a constitutional flaw in the Board’s statute. Based on that statute, however, the Board closed its front door to all applicants similarly situated. The majority is saying that nevertheless, each applicant, one…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API