Legal Opinion

United States v. Thirteen (13) Gambling Devices

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 20, 1977No. 848, Docket 76-6170PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this in rem proceeding involving thirteen gambling machines, claimant Alexander Horner appeals from a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a bench trial before John M. Cannella, J., ordering forfeiture of the machines under 15 U.S.C. § 1177. In his memorandum opinion, the judge held that the machines were gambling devices under 15 U.S.C. § 1171, that they were not exempt under 15 U.S.C. § 1172 or 15 U.S.C. § 1178, and that the evidence established that Horner “was well aware of the nature, function and use of the machines . . . . The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Jack Dailey McKeehan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. North Beach Amusement Company, Inc., a Body Corporate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. Twelve Miami Digger Slot MacHinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API