United States v. Thirteen (13) Gambling Devices
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
In this in rem proceeding involving thirteen gambling machines, claimant Alexander Horner appeals from a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a bench trial before John M. Cannella, J., ordering forfeiture of the machines under 15 U.S.C. § 1177. In his memorandum opinion, the judge held that the machines were gambling devices under 15 U.S.C. § 1171, that they were not exempt under 15 U.S.C. § 1172 or 15 U.S.C. § 1178, and that the evidence established that Horner “was well aware of the nature, function and use of the machines . . . . The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jack Dailey McKeehan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- North Beach Amusement Company, Inc., a Body Corporate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Twelve Miami Digger Slot MacHinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984