Legal Opinion

Donald v. Triple S Well Service, Inc.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1998No. 93-CT-01365-SCTPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

708 So.2d 1318 (1998)

James H. DONALD and Barbara Lindsay Donald

v.

TRIPLE S WELL SERVICE, INC.

No. 93-CT-01365-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 12, 1998.

Rehearing Denied May 14, 1998.

James Kenneth Wetzel, Gulfport, for Appellants.

Richard F. Yarbrough, Jr., Aultman Tyner McNeese & Ruffin, Columbia, for Appellee.

En Banc.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

BANKS, Justice, for the Court:

¶ 1. In this case we determine whether the introduction of evidence of alcohol use, where that evidence is ultimately found to be insufficient to create a viable issue as to any fact to be tried, is such error as…

Also in this document: Dissent · Mills; Dissent · Mills.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tharp v. Bunge Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Joel Reyes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Shore v. TurmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Braswell v. Economy Supply CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Allen v. BlanksMississippi Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bocanegra v. Vicmar Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. WoodsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Abrams v. Marlin Firearms Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Churchill v. Pearl River Basin Dev. Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. White v. MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API