Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. Sullivan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before the Hon. J. W. Oliver. The opinion of the court gives a lucid statement of the material facts of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

In 1868, this suit was instituted in the District Court by H. H. Sullivan, against Bethel Spurlock, upon a certain promissory note for eleven hundred and fifty dollars, dated in 1866, and to foreclose a mortgage given upon a tract of land, to secure the payment of the note. The appellants intervened, and claimed an equitable interest in the mortgaged land, and in their petition' of intervention they alleged that the land was purchased by Bethel Spurlock, for the common benefit of the intervenors and said Bethel and Drury Spurlock, and that though he took the deed for the land in his own name,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Padgett v. LawrenceNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. Small v. SmithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Payne v. CutlerNew York Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Steffian v. Milmo National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Tobin v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Brown v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Sweeney v. BixlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Dunlap v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API