Legal Opinion

Monochem, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 31, 1969No. 49353, 49354PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Justice:

East Ascension Telephone Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as EATEL) and the Louisiana Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) jointly appeal to this Court from a judgment of the trial court which ordered EATEL to furnish Monochem, Inc. two additional foreign exchange telephones and The Borden Company three additional foreign exchange telephones, each from the Baton Rouge Exchange of Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company to the two companies’ plants at Geismar, Louisiana, and decreed that the interconnection charge of $75.00 per month…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. Southern Bell T. & T. Co. v. LOUISIANA PUB. SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  4. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  5. Vicksburg, S. &. P. Ry. Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. So. Cent. Bell Tel. v. La. Public Service Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. La. Power & Light Co. v. La. Public Serv. Com'n.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Louisiana Oil. Car. Ass'n, Inc. v. Louisiana PS Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. LOUISIANA, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. Dixie Elec. Membership Co-Op. v. LA. PSCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API