State v. Nelson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This appeal involves the amount of restitution the trial court ordered as part of Michael Nelson’s sentence. The State concedes that the trial court erred in its calculation of restitution and that the case should be remanded for the trial court to correct the amount. There is no disagreement between the parties that the correct amount of restitution should be $7,500.
Facts
[¶ 2.] The State’s initial complaint alleged Nelson had committed six counts of forgery. At the preliminary hearing, the court dismissed all but Counts I and II. A jury found Nelson guilty of both…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MulliganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. MulliganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. MulliganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007