Legal Opinion

State v. Berg and McAweeney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

’ The defendants John Berg and F. J. McAweeney were jointly indicted for the crime of attempted larceny. They were tried separately and each was convicted and sentenced. The facts are the same in each case. Both attempted to appeal to this court. The district" attorney moved to dismiss the appeals for the reason that the notices of appeal were not served upon the clerk of the circuit court, where the judgment rolls are, as required by section 13-1209, Oregon Code 1930.

Notices of appeal were served upon the district attorney. No notice of appeal in either case was served upon the clerk of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HornerOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. MageskeOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. BergerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State v. BlazierOregon Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. MELGREEN ET UX v. McGUIRE, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gairson v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Broom v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. ArcherdOregon Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API