Legal Opinion

Explo, Inc. v. Johnson & Morgan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1982No. 1014PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Expío, Inc. has appealed from the order of the court below granting the petition to open judgment filed by Don R. Johnson and William Morgan, trading and doing business as Johnson & Morgan. The central issue for our determination is whether the court below abused its discretion in opening the judgment. The court below held that Johnson & Morgan had a meritorious defense; that the petition to open was promptly filed; and that Johnson & Morgan had a reasonable explanation for their failure to respond. We disagree, and accordingly reverse the order of the court below.

Appellant’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Ecumenical Enterprises, Inc. v. NADCO Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Tronzo v. Equitable Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Van Horn v. AlperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Burkett v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Marzullo v. Stop-N-Go Food Stores of Pittsburgh, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Didyk v. Burns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API