Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hill v. Six Flags Over Georgia, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1980No. 59591Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I believe the trial court was absolutely correct in granting summary judgment to appellee. I therefore respectfully dissent.

The uncontroverted facts are as follows: Appellant, a certified welder, was hired by Jack Heaton Erectors to work at Six Flags with another Heaton employee, Henry Buster Newmon. Cecil Hale, a Heaton company supervisor introduced appellant and Newmon to Nelson Boyd, mechanical engineer at Six Flags. Boyd had an agreement with Heaton Erectors under which appellant and Newmon were to work under the supervision of Boyd or one of his designees. The agreement placed control of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reaves v. Columbus Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Brewer v. Southeastern Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ForresterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  5. Varnadoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API