Legal Opinion

State v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 13, 2001No. 00-2605-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETTESHEIM J.

¶ 1. Alfredo Ramirez appeals from a judgment of conviction for misappropriating the personal identifying information of another pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 943.201(2) (1999-2000). 2 This offense is sometimes referred to as theft of identity. Ramirez contends that the statute as applied in this case represents an ex post facto law in violation of article I, section 12 of the Wisconsin Constitution. Like the trial court, we hold that the statute creates a "continuing offense" under Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970), and John v. State, 96 Wis. 2d 183, 291 N.W.2d 502 (1980).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. MacK v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. John v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. LeydaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LeydaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. MontoyaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API