Matter of Martin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
A hearing was held to determine whether to commit appellant Louis Martin as mentally ill. A medical records custodian testified by telephone to provide foundation for the admission of appellant’s medical records. The trial court committed appellant as mentally ill. Martin appeals, contending that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the medical records and that the error was prejudicial. We affirm.
FACTS
A hearing was held on the petition to commit appellant as mentally ill. Respondent first sought to lay foundation for the admission of a certified copy of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- National Tea Co. v. Tyler Refrigeration Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Matter of FusaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. DieltzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re IrwinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re of the Civil Commitment of JanckilaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003