Legal Opinion

Prescott Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 8, 1981No. 4178-6-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoe, J.

— Prescott Telephone and Telegraph Company (Prescott) operates a telephone exchange in Roslyn. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company (PNB) operates the exchanges in adjacent Cle Elum and Easton. In telephone exchange maps submitted in 1929 and 1948 PNB also claimed coverage of the North Easton Ridge area, which lies between the Roslyn exchange and the Easton and Cle Elum exchanges. Although PNB has included this area in its exchange maps, presently no one lives in the service area, nor does PNB expect any service to be needed in the near future.

In May 1977, Prescott filed a complaint with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Washington State Liquor Control Board v. Washington State Personnel BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Griffin v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. DuPont-Fort Lewis School District No. 7 v. BrunoWashington Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API