Legal Opinion

Fagnant v. Foss

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 30, 2013No. 2012-030PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for reargument, an amicus curiae memorandum of law in support of that motion filed by the Attorney General’s Office, and plaintiff’s memorandum of law in opposition to the motion, we grant the motion for reargument, withdraw our opinion of March 15, 2013, and replace it with the instant opinion dismissing this appeal as untimely filed.

¶ 2. The facts surrounding the timeliness issue are undisputed. On September 23, 2011, the jury entered a verdict, and on September 26, 2011, the trial court entered a judgment, in favor of defendant. Having…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sears v. SearsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Acevedo Villalobos v. Hon. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Charles L.M., Susan R.M. By Her Next Friend, Charles L.M. v. Northeast Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Lizardo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Application of Beach Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Michael Bandler, MB&Co, Ltd. a/k/a Michael Bandler & Company v. Cohen Rosenthal & Kramer, LLPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. In re Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee v. Skip Watts & Paris WattsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. In Re Estate of BoydVermont Superior Court · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API