Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Cf & I Steel Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
In Martin v. OSHRC, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1171, 113 L.Ed.2d 117 (1991), the Supreme Court held that a reasonable interpretation of the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) is to be preferred over a reasonable interpretation of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission) when it comes to an ambiguous regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act). Id., 111 S.Ct. at 1175, 1179-80. We had held to the contrary. Dole v. OSHRC, 891 F.2d 1495, 1499 (10th Cir.1989), rev’d, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1171, 113 L.Ed.2d 117 (1991). In so holding,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crown Pacific v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Cascade Energy & Metals Corp. v. Banks (In re Cascade Energy & Metals Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Halliburton Energy Services v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Tierdael Construction Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.