Legal Opinion
Studer v. Bleistein
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action brought by Jacob H. Studer against George Bleistein, as president of the Courier Company, to recover damages for breach of contract. Trial before a referee, who reported in favor of defendant, and from the judgment entered thereon plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.
The plaintiff and Charles W. MeCune, as president of the Courier Company, on the 25th of April, 1881, entered into the following agreement:
“ Jacob JR. Studer, Fsq., Columbus, Ohio—Dear Sir: We will furnish the press-work and paper, 24x30, 60 lb. book, tint, No. 1, and tissue paper, and bind your work, ‘ Birds of North America,’ in • American Russia, ’ like sample furnished, at $4.55 each; you to furnish the plates and title page. Same in full morocco, $2.85; cloth, $2.26. Any alterations in electrotype plates to be charged at 50c. per hour. The Courier Co.
“C. W. McCune, Pres.”
This was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Boardman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Manufacturers' & Traders' Bank v. HazardNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Norton v. . DreyfussNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carleton v. Lombard, Ayres & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
- Bleistein v. StuderSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1888
- Bellclair v. Wirth & Hamid, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1929
- Winchell v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1889