Fritts v. Fregly
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County
1Opinion of the Court
RANCK, J.,
We have before us defendants’ preliminary objections to plaintiffs’ amended complaint. In their complaint, plaintiffs allege that they were determined to be financially eligible to receive cash and medical assistance by the Northumberland County Board of Assistance (hereinafter the board). As a result of plaintiffs’ eligibility, defendants Henry Fregly, Thomas Hod-rick, Pauline Yeager, and Does I-X, all employes of the board, had access to the board’s records concerning plaintiffs. The complaint states that these defendants, either jointly or separately, disclosed or caused to be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.