Legal Opinion
Hamill v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division correctly concluded that there was insufficient evidence of negligence to present a jury question, as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bernstein v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Valentine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Davis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hoenig v. ShyedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Rand v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.