Legal Opinion

Sigurdson v. Department of Social & Health Services

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 2010No. 63495-0-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.

¶1 Pacing the possible involuntary termination of her parental rights through a dependency termination *909proceeding, Carmen Sigurdson decided to voluntarily relinquish her rights to the Department of Social and Health Services (Department) in exchange for an open adoption arrangement. After a court commissioner approved the agreement, Sigurdson changed her mind and sought to revoke her consent to the relinquishment and adoption. She argued that duress exerted by her mother justified revocation. Interpreting the duress provision under RCW 26.33-.160, the commissioner denied her motion,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. In re the Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. In Re Dependency Of: Z.f.s., Marie Smith v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API