Ga. Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Gammage

I think that the charge treated in division 2 of the majority opinion was erroneous. In the absence of a statutory prohibition, such a contract of insurance as in this *131case is lawful if no reason appears why it is contrary to public policy. 29 Am. Jur. 184, § 166, note 7; Liberty National Life Ins. Co. v. Parrimore, 68 Ga. App. 623. The subject matter of the charge was foreign to any issue in the case and was misleading and confusing. Under such a policy the appearance of the insured is immaterial, and such a policy cannot be said in any and every event to insure against a malady or disease…