Legal Opinion

Charles Flowers v. Veterans Help Group

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 26, 2025No. 8:25-cv-01803Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHARLES FLOWERS, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civ. No. DLB-25-1803 VETERANS HELP GROUP, * Defendant. * MEMORANDUM & ORDER Charles Flowers, who is proceeding without counsel, has sued Veterans Help Group (“VHG”), claiming the organization wrongfully obtained a cut of his Veteran’s benefits award for attorney’s fees. VHG moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Flowers’s claims, the motion to dismiss is granted. I. Background The following allegations are from Flowers’s complaint.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. Davis v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  5. ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC v. HolibaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API