Legal Opinion

Wood Conversion Co. v. Armstrong Cork Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1967No. 4-63 Civil 55Published

1Opinion of the Court

*379MEMORANDUM DECISION

NORDBYE, District Judge.

This proceeding is a declaratory-judgment action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to have United States Letters Patent D-188,491 for the design of a “Ceiling Tile Or The Like” declared invalid and not infringed. The defendant is the owner of the patent in suit and has counterclaimed to have the patent declared valid and infringed by the plaintiff.

Plaintiff is a corporation of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in St. Paul, Minnesota. Defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Ditto, Incorporated v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. Ditto, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. Midland Flour Milling Co. v. BobbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Swenson v. BoosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API