Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1996No. A95A2596PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Peters represented plaintiff Gomez in a criminal trial in which Gomez was convicted of one count of child molestation and acquitted on two other counts (one for child molestation and one for cruelty to children). With new counsel, Gomez filed a motion for new trial, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel among other claims. After a hearing on the motion, the trial court explicitly rejected the ineffective assistance claim but granted the motion for new trial on other grounds. Having spent approximately nine months in *58jail while his motion for new…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carmel v. LunneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. McDow v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Hockett v. BreunigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Kent v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Hogan v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gibson v. TrantTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Canaan v. BarteeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Berringer v. SteeleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Humphries v. DETCHWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API