State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*639VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for manslaughter in the first degree. ORS 163.118. The case, was tried to the court on stipulated facts following the partial denial of defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence. The issue is whether the trial court erred in denying part of defendant’s motion. We affirm.
Shortly before midnight on August 6,1982, defendant telephoned his brother in California and told him that he had just “strangled a kid.”1 The brother advised defendant to call a mental hospital or talk to someone who could help him with *640his problem. Minutes later,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984