Legal Opinion

McMannomy v. Walker

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Creditor’s Bill.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1896.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion oe the Court.

The statutory law of this State has been always, in substance, what it is now—that courts having chancery jurisdiction are to proceed “ according to the general usage and practice of courts of equity ” in particulars not regulated by statute, or rules established by the judges of the respective courts, “ consistent with the practice of courts of chancery, in cases not provided for by law.” Secs. 1 and 2, Ch. 22, Chancery.

Thus the general usage and practice of courts of equity, in particulars not otherwise regulated by statute or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harding v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Mahone v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  3. White v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Hurd v. GoodrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Mosier v. NortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rimmer v. O'Brien-Green Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Stone v. BillingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. Comstock-Castle Stove Co. v. BaldwinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  4. Prairie State Loan & Building Ass'n v. NublingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Richards v. John Spry Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API