Walker v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

The state raises the following points in its motion: (1) the opinion conflicts with other decisions of this court in which an escalating pattern of criminality was based entirely upon nonviolent offenses; (2) the panel overlooked evidence of appellant’s violation of the trial court’s order, and (3) the opinion erroneously suggests that appellant’s $50,000.00 fine should not have been imposed.

With regard to appellant’s fine, we noted that the fine was required by section 893.-135(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (1985). The remand for “costs and other…