Armstrong v. Prewitt
Supreme Court of Missouri
cited: Semi.~annuai part, Mo.~ Rep. 53-b; 3 Ma. Rep. 39O~ Littell's Select Oases. eitei~ 1 Bibbs B~eo. 547z I J. Ren. 290: 1 Mar. IL 458-9~ ~3 J. R. 26; 18 J. R. 419~ 2 Lii. R. 232; 1 Mar. U7. 118; 1 J. J. M. 6O~.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGirk, Judge
Prewitt, assignee, brought an action of debt by petition and summons. It appears by the record that Prewitt became the assignee of a bond from one White to him, made by the defendant and another person. `The defendant pleaded that the other obhigor was dead, and that White, before his assignment, had obtnined judgment in the county court against the representative of the do-ceased obligor for the amount, and prayed judgment whether the plaintifPshould have his action. The plaim-tiff demurred and had judgment; this is assigned for error.
A judgment a. one of two obligois, “tlu.ac‘ an action…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Jameson v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. LandisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Knox County Savings Bank v. CotteySupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Rigler v. McClureMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Doty v. Irwin-Phillips Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.