Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Lewis

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 19, 1958No. Civ. A. 973-56PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

This is an action for a judgment declaring that plaintiff is entitled to pension benefits under the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1950 and the trust known as the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund, and for a money judgment against the Trustees of the Fund in the amount of $100 per month from the date of plaintiff’s eligibility to benefits to the date of judgment.

The Wage Agreement provides that there shall be paid by each coal operator signatory a sum of money measured by the amount of coal produced and that the fund thus created…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
  2. Van Horn v. LewisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
  3. Hobbs v. LewisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. George Wolfe v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. John Kosty v. John L. Lewis, Trustees, United Mine Workers of America Welfare Andretirement Fund of 1950Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API