Legal Opinion

Guignard v. Corley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 20, 1928No. 12498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was .delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action for partition, instituted by the plaintiffs as the personal representatives of G. A. Guignard, deceased, under his will, against 29 defendants, alleged to be tenants in common with G. A. Guignard, of certain real estate situated in and near the Town of Cayce, in Lexington County. The principal defendant in the issues now presented is the Cáyce Land Company, between which company and G. A. Guignard there has heretofore been much litigation. See 124 S. C., 443; 117 S. E., 644; 131 S. C., 296; 127 S. E., 364; 135…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cagle v. SchaeferSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. Vaughan v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. Young v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  4. Cain v. CainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  5. Trimmier v. DardenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Pioneer Mill Co. v. WardHawaii Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bishop v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. SHUMAKER v. ShumakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. Bank of Swansea v. RuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API