Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Krasner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1981No. 128Published

1DissentSpaeth, Judge

I do not agree that defendant voluntarily and knowingly waived for an indefinite and unlimited period his right to a speedy trial as provided by Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. An abiding temptation is to bend the rules when the case is nasty. Here, I suggest, the rules have been bent. Once bent, rules don’t work well.

In Commonwealth v. Coleman, 477 Pa. 400, 383 A.2d 1268 (1978) (plurality opinion), Justice O’BRIEN wrote that the defendant’s waiver was invalid because the form he signed “offer[ed] no explanation of what the right to a speedy trial involve[d].” 477 Pa. at 406, 383 A.2d at 1271.1 The form…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Commonwealth v. ManleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Daniels v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Harry C. Erb, Inc. v. Shell Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API