State v. Robinson

Irwin, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lamont A. Robinson appeals from his conviction and sentence for fourth-offense driving under the influence (DUI). On appeal, Robinson asserts that the trial court erred in receiving the results of an Intoxilyzer test without sufficient foundation, that the trial court erred in convicting him without sufficient evidence, and that the trial court erred in imposing an excessive sentence. We find no merit to any of these assigned errors, and accordingly, we affirm.

II. BACKGROUND

On February 17, 2000, an information was filed charging Robinson with DUI. On February…