Legal Opinion

Trenton Masonic Temple Ass'n v. City of Trenton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 1, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Supreme Court will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam, opinion if that court, ubi supra, except as herein noted. It is intimated obiter in that opinion, that “if any one of the Masonic organizations owned and occupied the whole building, the exemption would occur.” This proposition was not a necessary element in the decision, and we deem it best to reserve any expression of opinion on it in this court until it is directly presented.

Apart from this, we concur in the views expressed by the Supreme Court, and that concurrence leads to an affirmance of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Princeton University Press v. Borough of PrincetonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. City of Long Branch v. Monmouth Medical CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Mega Care, Inc. v. Union TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996
  4. Bloomfield v. ACADEMY OF MED. OF NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. City of Jersey City v. ConventionNew Jersey Tax Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API