Legal Opinion
People v. OIKNINE
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1999No. B127577PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
The People of the State of California appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing the indictment in this case pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, codified in California in Penal Code section 1389. This indictment contained five counts that had previously been filed against respondent Assaf Oiknine in People v. Oiknine (Super. Ct. L.A. County, No. BA151583) (case No. BA151583), plus six new counts. The People contend that the trial court erred in dismissing these six new counts. We agree, and reverse that portion of the trial court’s order dismissing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Harland Lee BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- People v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jason Loyd Ross v. Barbara Von BlanckenseeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- People v. Anthony CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Prince v. Invensure Ins. BrokersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018