Legal Opinion
City of Cincinnati v. Black
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 1966No. 9754PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHover, J.
Appellant, defendant below, was convicted in the Municipal Court of Cincinnati of violating Section 901-s3 of the Ordinances thereof. The section is entitled ‘ ‘ Scurrilous Pamphlet” and reads as follows:
“Whoever shall offer for sale or sell or give away any pamphlet or paper which contains an article or articles subjecting to ridicule or contempt any class or group of citizens on account of its or their race or religious belief, or which in any manner tends to promote racial hatred or religious bigotry, shall be fined not exceeding fifty dollars ($50.00).”
The specific charge was that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Village of Arlington HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Bradesku v. AntionOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- State ex rel. Pizza v. Tom. S. A., Inc.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1981