Legal Opinion

Department of Ecology v. City of Spokane Valley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 3, 2012No. 29675-0-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 Since its adoption by voters 40 years ago,1 the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), chapter 90.58 RCW, has provided that no development may be undertaken on Washington shorelines unless consistent with the policy of the SMA and any local shoreline master program. RCW 90.58.140(1). The requirement is effectuated by requiring that anyone undertaking a substantial development on the shoreline first obtain a permit from the appropriate local jurisdiction. RCW 90.58.140(2). The definition of “substantial development” is subject to a dozen exceptions, one being “Construction of a dock . ..…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. State v. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Lucid Group Usa, V State LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  4. State of Washington v. Taylor Ross LandrumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Tazmina Verjee-van & Brian Van v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API