People v. Khan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s request for a justification charge, though made after summations and the court’s initial charge, neither of which referred to that defense, was timely (CPL 300.10 [5]). The court’s denial of the request was improper even though the act upon which the defense is based was not intentional (see, People v McManus, 67 NY2d 541; People v Padgett, 60 NY2d 142; People v Huntley, 87 AD2d 488, affd 59 NY2d 868).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Kaye, Alexan*923der, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur; Judge…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. PadgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. McManusNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. HuntleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by19 opinions
- Blazic v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Blazic v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- People v. JeffriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. LigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.