Legal Opinion

People v. Khan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1986PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s request for a justification charge, though made after summations and the court’s initial charge, neither of which referred to that defense, was timely (CPL 300.10 [5]). The court’s denial of the request was improper even though the act upon which the defense is based was not intentional (see, People v McManus, 67 NY2d 541; People v Padgett, 60 NY2d 142; People v Huntley, 87 AD2d 488, affd 59 NY2d 868).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Kaye, Alexan*923der, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur; Judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PadgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. McManusNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. HuntleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Blazic v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Blazic v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. People v. JeffriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. LigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API