Legal Opinion
Kelly, Messick, Schoenleber & Miller Associates v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 7, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
MICHELS, P.J.A.D.
Defendant Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (Atlantic Mutual) appeals from a judgment of the Law Division which declared that it had a duty to defend and indemnify plaintiffs Kelly, Messick, Schoenleber & Miller Associates (KMSM) and Martin P. Schoenleber (Schoenleber), Leonard Miller (Miller) and Frank Kelly (Kelly) in a separate civil action for damages *398brought against them by the purchasers of units in the Bienvenue Condominiums.
The pertinent facts giving rise to this appeal may be summarized as follows. In conjunction with Kelly,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Fagliarone v. North Bergen Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Vargas v. CalabreseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- KELLY, ETC. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987