Legal Opinion

Heidbreder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 13, 1992No. 91-1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The judgment of conviction of attempted first degree murder is affirmed, there being no abuse of discretion by the trial court in excluding the specific testimony identified in Appellant’s brief.

We likewise affirm Appellant’s sentence. The trial court’s decision to use the category 1 scoresheet rather than the category 9 scoresheet when sentencing Appellant is consistent with this court’s decision in Hayles v. State, 596 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). As in Hayles, we certify direct conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tarawneh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Hayles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heidbreder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API