Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1975No. 50544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Judge.

The determining issue in this case is whether, under the facts existing in the transcript, an automobile was being operated within its permitted purpose at the time it was involved in a tragic accident. If so, the ensuing damages are insured by the omnibus clause in Allstate’s automobile liability policy issued to the owner — the named insured. There is no disagreement to the fact that the son of the named insured was furnished the car for the son’s general use and transportation. The son had little limitation on his permitted use and no limitation at all which could affect…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Hemphill v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. NAT. SERVICES INDUS. v. Transamerica Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Sentry Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. National Services Industries, Inc. v. Transamerica InuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API