Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Hunt

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 15, 1831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was an action on the case for enticing away N. W. Tucker, an apprentice of the-plaintiff on the 21st January, 1823. The cause was tried at May term, 1830, upon the general issue, when it appeared in evidence, that N. W. Tucker, was the son of Nathaniel Tucker, of Norwich, in the State of Vermont; that he was horn in the year 1820 ; that his father and mother were settled in the town of Norwich, in the year 1822 ; that the father and mother, in that year separated, and…

Read the full summary

This was an action on the case for enticing away N. W. Tucker, an apprentice of the-plaintiff on the 21st January, 1823. The cause was tried at May term, 1830, upon the general issue, when it appeared in evidence, that N. W. Tucker, was the son of Nathaniel Tucker, of Norwich, in the State of Vermont; that he was horn in the year 1820 ; that his father and mother were settled in the town of Norwich, in the year 1822 ; that the father and mother, in that year separated, and have never cohabited together since that time ; that the apprentice, when his father and mother separated, went to live…

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

One question in this case is, whether the bringing of the pauper, for such the child was, into this state, was not illegal, and the indentures void on this ground. The letter of the statute imposes a penalty upon any person,

*404who knowingly brings and leaves, or with intent to leave, a pauper who has no settlement here, from another state, into any town in this state. But we are of opinion, that the intent of the statute was to prohibit the bringing of paupers into the state and leaving them, or with intent to leave them, a charge upon some town, or upon the state ; and that as there could have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  2. Day v. EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  3. Fanning v. ConsequaCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1820
  4. Service v. HeermanceNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  5. Commonwealth v. HamiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. BoardmanSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1843
  2. Stevens v. NorrisSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API