Legal Opinion

United States v. Calderon-Pena

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2003No. 02-20331PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Pedro Calderon-Pena was convicted of illegal reentry of a removed alien under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He challenges his conviction, arguing that the underlying indictment was invalid because the prior removal order violated his due process rights. He also challenges his sentence, contending that his prior conviction for endangering a child was not a crime of violence under the sentencing guidelines, or alternatively that the use of the 2001 version of the guidelines violated the ex post facto clause of the Constitution. We affirm the conviction and sentence.

*323I.

In 1999,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. Joel Lopez-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Pedro Calderon-PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Perry v. Dearing (In Re Perry)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Ricardo Aguirre-TelloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Juan Larin-Ulloa v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API